<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://community.eqo.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EQO Community - carrier-hate</title>
 <link>http://community.eqo.com/taxonomy/term/730/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Prepare to feel your carrier-hate well from within.&quot;</title>
 <link>http://community.eqo.com/blog/chris/prepare_to_feel_your_carrier_hate_well_from_within</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://cache.vzw.com/images_b2c/shared/nav/logo_vzw.gif&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; height=&quot;60&quot; width=&quot;171&quot; /&gt;I love &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadgetmobile.com/&quot;&gt;Engadget&lt;/a&gt; for injecting wonderful quotes like that into their mobile news.  Indeed, carrier-hate is surely warranted in this case, since the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/27/fcc-fast-tracking-700mhz-open-access-rule-changes-under-intense/&quot;&gt;FCC is now fast tracking amendments to their open-access policy for the upcoming 700MHz auction&lt;/a&gt;, all thanks to the lawyers on retainer to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/index.html&quot;&gt;Verizon Wireless&lt;/a&gt;.  It had looked like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/&quot;&gt;FCC&lt;/a&gt; was going to enforce open-access rules for the tasty &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/chris/verizon_sues_fcc_for_evil_reasons&quot;&gt;700MHz spectrum&lt;/a&gt;, giving innovative companies like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com&quot;&gt;Apple&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; a shot at next generation wireless networks and services.  However, it seems that Verizon&amp;#39;s lawsuit, claiming that open-access is unconstitutional, has the spineless FCC looking to protect its auction windfall (estimated at $15billion).  Instead of fighting for what is right, the FCC will likely cave.  Does this mean that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carterfone&quot;&gt;Carterphone&lt;/a&gt; ruling is unconstitutional?  Of course not, it means that innovation will be stifled because Verizon is an evil moneybags corporation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;br /&gt;EQO Customer Evangelist &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;!--
&lt;rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#&quot; xmlns:dc=&quot;http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/&quot; xmlns:trackback=&quot;http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/&quot;&gt;
&lt;rdf:Description rdf:about=&quot;http://community.eqo.com/blog/chris/prepare_to_feel_your_carrier_hate_well_from_within&quot; dc:identifier=&quot;http://community.eqo.com/blog/chris/prepare_to_feel_your_carrier_hate_well_from_within&quot; dc:title=&quot;&amp;quot;Prepare to feel your carrier-hate well from within.&amp;quot;&quot; trackback:ping=&quot;http://community.eqo.com/trackback/1025&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/rdf:RDF&gt;
--&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://community.eqo.com/blog/chris/prepare_to_feel_your_carrier_hate_well_from_within#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://community.eqo.com/tags/700mhz">700mhz</category>
 <category domain="http://community.eqo.com/tags/carrier_hate">carrier-hate</category>
 <category domain="http://community.eqo.com/tags/engadget">engadget</category>
 <category domain="http://community.eqo.com/tags/eqo">eqo</category>
 <category domain="http://community.eqo.com/tags/eqo_mobile">eqo mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://community.eqo.com/tags/fcc">fcc</category>
 <category domain="http://community.eqo.com/tags/verizon">verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:33:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1025 at http://community.eqo.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
